Skip to main content
A course report connects dashboard patterns to individual student submissions.
AI Detection reports are embedded workbooks. Their tabs, filters, and summary metrics can vary by workspace and report version. Follow the labels and metric descriptions in your report; the examples below may not all appear.

Open a course report

Open AI Detection Dashboard, open the course summary provided by your workbook, and select the course you want to review.
The Canvas entry appears only where your institution has installed and enabled the LTI. Students do not receive reporting access through this faculty workflow.

Read the submission list

A course report can include:
  • submission title
  • submission type, such as assignment, discussion, or quiz
  • AI classification
  • AI probability or confidence
  • student’s name
  • submission date
  • read status
Some course reports initially focus on AI Only and Mixed results. If available, turn on Display All Submissions when you need the full processed population, including Human Only results.

Review a course consistently

1

Confirm the course

Check the course title, code, and term before you review results.
2

Confirm the visible population

If your report offers Display All Submissions, check whether it is on. Note any other active filters.
3

Sort your review queue

Use classification, date, submission type, or read status to organize work. Do not use the probability alone as a disciplinary cutoff.
4

Open the submission

Select a row to inspect the overall result and sentence-level highlighting.
5

Record your review state

Use the available read status and your institution’s case process so another reviewer can understand what remains.

Avoid common comparison errors

  • Compare submissions from the same course and assignment context when possible.
  • Do not compare percentages across different filters without confirming both populations.
  • Treat short, formulaic, heavily quoted, translated, or accessibility-assisted writing with extra care.
  • Check whether the assignment allowed generative tools and how students were asked to disclose them.
  • Keep the original submission and other evidence central to the review.
A course-level list is a triage tool. It does not replace an instructor’s review or your institution’s academic-integrity process.
Continue with Submission results.
Last modified on September 16, 2026